Frankly, I would rather pay for Substance package and find a replacement for photoshop out there. Why pay for the All Apps when it's no longer the All Apps or even the Best apps from Adobe? Substance Painter for instance is exactly everything 3d in Photoshop always should have been. But I can just imagine how many people are turned off by this and how this is introducing a reason for a great many of your steadfast customers to start investigating other solutions for what we use Photoshop and Illusstrator and other mainstays of the subscription CC. I feel it's just your classic money grab by someone to show increased profits in a board room.

And they have taken something that used to be in the Creative Cloud subscription and removed it and made it a separate subscription suite.Ĭ. But what has happened now is that our Photoshop and Creative Cloud All Apps package is now a lessor package than what we used to get. Understandably why, given this substance3d app now in Adobe skinned software is simply amazing. Now they have purchased Substance3d and decided to completely drop 3D from Photoshop.

Adobe has always failed at 3d offerings in the past but not without trying, and therefore getting us to try try try to learn to use their 3d offerings within photoshop and illustrator. But they were always seperate apps, not seperate collections. The couple apps they never brought into it, framemaker and captivate were always a strange decision to most inquiring why. Now you got ALL apps, one of the great features you get to make it worth the annual payments. When they moved to subscription plans they combined many of their seperate 'collections' and used that combining to sell the idea of this subscription format.

But I'm 100% with you that these should be included for a number of reasons.Ī. They are using Creative Cloud which is installed on all our machines to advertise the new substance 3d products, and give us easy access to the trials.

Adobe substance 3d creative cloud